In Flores v. Southcoast Automotive Liquidators, Inc., ___ Cal.App.5th ___ (Nov. 27, 2017), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Five) held that "an appropriate correction offer under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA; Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.) does not prevent a consumer from pursuing causes of action for fraud and violation of the UCL based on the same conduct, because the remedies are cumulative." Slip op. at 2 (footnote omitted).
CONTACT ME
Kimberly A. Kralowec
Kralowec Law, P.C.
3132A 24th Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Tel: (415) 546-6800
Fax: (415) 546-6801
Web:
www.kraloweclaw.com
Email: [email protected]
Twitter:
@uclpractitioner
About
January 2024
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Categories
- Appellate practice (90)
- Attorneys’ fees (CCP §1021.5) (53)
- Class Action "Fairness" Act (72)
- Class actions - arbitration (185)
- Class actions - certification (314)
- Class actions - choice of law (8)
- Class actions - discovery (15)
- Class actions - general (89)
- Class actions - settlements (60)
- Class actions - Supreme Court (212)
- General (101)
- Kralowec Law, P.C. (3)
- Law blogging (114)
- MCLE programs (154)
- News reports and practice articles (173)
- Prop. 64 - appellate briefs (24)
- Prop. 64 - appellate decisions (30)
- Prop. 64 - general (21)
- Prop. 64 - injury in fact (97)
- Prop. 64 - oral arguments (10)
- Prop. 64 - pending appeals (7)
- Prop. 64 - Supreme Court (73)
- Prop. 64 - trial court orders (3)
- Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec LLP (2)
- Supreme Court and Court of Appeal arguments (86)
- The CLRA (96)
- The Furth Firm LLP (22)
- UCL - "fraudulent" prong (62)
- UCL - "unfair" prong (70)
- UCL - "unlawful" prong (89)
- UCL - arbitration (6)
- UCL - class certification (21)
- UCL - competitor actions (21)
- UCL - federal decisions (49)
- UCL - injunctive relief (26)
- UCL - legislative activity (4)
- UCL - preemption (58)
- UCL - public prosecutor actions (65)
- UCL - remedies in general (101)
- UCL - restitution (44)
- UCL - Supreme Court (132)
FORMER SITE ARCHIVES (17200BLOG.COM)
« UCL insurance opinion: The Traveler's Property Cas. Co. v. Actavis, Inc. | Main | New class certification opinion: Hefczyc v. Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego »
Tuesday, November 28, 2017
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Class Actions
The CLRA
Brinker Links
- Plaintiffs' counsel in Brinker receive CLAY Awards (March 2013)
- Supreme Court depublishes third post-Brinker opinion (January 2013)
- Supreme Court depublishes post-Brinker opinions (December 2012)
- "Brinker v. Superior Court: Takeaways for California Workers" by Kimberly Kralowec (July 2012)
- Opinion in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004 (2012)
- Docket in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court
- Briefs in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court
- Oral argument in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (Nov. 8, 2011)
California Appellate Practice Links
- Cal. Rules of Court, Title Eight (Appellate Rules)
- New Appellate Opinions
- Supreme Court Notices of Forthcoming Filings
- Supreme Court Notices of Oral Argument
- Supreme Court Internal Operating Procedures
- Map of California Appellate Districts
- Successful Depublication Requests
- Supreme Court Pending Issues Summary
- California Appellate Courts Case Information
LAW BLOG DIRECTORIES
- Alltop.com law page
- Blawg Directory (ABA Journal)
- Blawg Directory: California (ABA Journal)
- Blawg Republic
- Blawg Search (Justia)
- Blawg.org
- Blogged.com Law Blog Directory
- Blogs & Podcasts (FindLaw)
- Law Professor Blogs (Professor Paul L. Caron)
- LawLink Blog Directory
- LexMonitor
- myHq blawgs (Blawg Review)
- Taxonomy of Legal Blogs (Ian Best)
- The Law List (Kevin O'Keefe)
- USLaw Blog Directory
Disclaimer
Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or a solicitation for business. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney in your jurisdiction. To read this blog's complete disclaimer, click here.
The UCL Practitioner
© 2003-2022
by Kimberly A. Kralowec
All rights reserved.
Header design by Webmotion
Photos by Jack Gescheidt
Powered by TypePad
Follow @uclpractitioner
StatCounter
An important feature of this decision is that it contradicts and resolves the dicta in Benson v. Southern California Auto Sales (2015) 239 Cal.App.4th 1198, 1209-1210, which supported the notion that damages sought in other causes of action are likewise barred if a CLRA correction offer is not accepted. The rule is now the opposite.
Posted by: David Cooper | Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 10:23 AM