As reported on Wednesday by my fellow bloggers over at At the Lectern, the Supreme Court denied review this week in my Unruh Act and UCL case for age discrimination against Tinder. Candelore v. Tinder, No. S247527. See these two blog posts for more about the case.
I'm particularly pleased by this result. This one was a challenge, given the published opinion and what, at first glance, might look like a split in authority between intermediate appellate decisions. I worked hard to craft a series of compelling reasons for denying review, and I'm very happy that the Supreme Court seems to have found them persuasive.
The denial of review sends a strong signal that the Court of Appeal correctly decided the case and properly construed the Supreme Court’s Unruh Act precedents. The Court of Appeal's published opinion is Candelore v. Tinder, Inc., 19 Cal.App.5th 1138 (2018).
Comments