Supreme Court denies review in Dunham v. Memberworks

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court declined to review the Court of Appeal's unpublished opinion in Dunham v. Memberworks, case no. A107261 (First Appellate District, Division Five), even though both parties requested it. As I explained here, the Court of Appeal held that Prop. 64 applies retroactively to pending cases, but that the trial court may grant leave to amend to add an affected plaintiff. There is a definite pattern here. The Supreme Court is granting review in Prop. 64 retroactivity cases only if the Court of Appeal's opinion is published.

Previous
Previous

Supreme Court review sought in two more Prop. 64 cases

Next
Next

Ninth Circuit asks Supreme Court to decide whether the First Amendment protects what you say on your website: ReadyLink Healthcare v. Lynch