"Courts Get Muddled on What's 'Unfair' in Consumer Actions"

This article by Michael Mallow was in the Daily Journal last Wednesday. (Unfortunately, the Daily Journal's website does not have pass-through links to specific articles.) The article discusses the Court of Appeal's opinion in Bardin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Feb. 23, 2006), which asked the Supreme Court and/or the legislature to provide guidance on the meaning of "unfair." According to the online case information site, no petition for review has been filed yet. My original post on Bardin is here.

Previous
Previous

New class member communication decision: Experian Information Solutions v. Superior Court

Next
Next

New unpublished UCL/privilege decision: Othman v. Wells Fargo