Daugherty answer and reply briefs and depublication requests now available online
The answer and reply in Daugherty v. American Honda Motor Co., no. S148931, are now available online (along with the petition for review, which I posted in December):
-
Petition for Review (filed 12/19/06)
-
Answer to Petition for Review (filed 01/12/07)
-
Reply Brief in Support of Petition for Review (filed 01/23/07)
In addition, a number of depublication requests have been filed:
-
Depublication Request of Center for Auto Safety (filed 12/22/05)
-
Depublication Request of Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety (filed 12/22/06)
-
Honda's Response to Depublication Requests (filed 01/02/07)
-
Depublication Request of National Consumer Law Center (filed 01/03/07)
-
Response of Non-Party Ford Motor Co. to Depublication Requests (filed 01/04/07)
-
Petitioners' Reply to Honda and Ford's Responses to Depublication Requests (submitted 01/18/07)
This is the case in which the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Eight) created a split in authority concerning the extent to which non-disclosures are actionable under the UCL and CLRA. My original post on Daugherty is here, and the published Court of Appeal opinion is Daugherty v. American Honda Motor Co., 144 Cal.App.4th 824 (Oct. 31, 2006). The Supreme Court should either take this case up or depublish the opinion.