New UCL "safe harbor" decision: Yabsley v. Cingular Wireless, LLC

In Yabsley v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Aug. 18, 2008), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six) held that an administrative regulation (specifically, a provision of the California Code of Regulations) can provide a Cel-Tech "safe harbor" for conduct that might otherwise violate the UCL.

Previous
Previous

New Third Circuit preemption decision: Fellner v. Tri-Union Seafoods, L.L.C.

Next
Next

New UCL/CLRA choice-of-law decision: Brack v. Omni Loan Co.