"Court Applies Tobacco II: Prop 64 Changed Standing Requirements, Not Substantive Law"

The October 9, 2009 issue of the BNA Class Action Litigation Report features an article on Morgan v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2009 WL 3019780 (Sept. 23, 2009), in which the Court of Appeal applied Tobacco II in a published opinion.  (For a discussion of Morgan, see this blog post.)

BNA kindly granted permission to Scott Leviant to post the full text of the article on his blog, The Complex Litigator.  Both Scott and I are quoted in the article. 

Previous
Previous

New UCL "unlawful" prong decision: Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.

Next
Next

Register at half price for the CASD Class Action Symposium, San Diego