Fall 2009 issue of Competition

The Fall 2009 issue of Competition, the journal of the State Bar's Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section, is out, and it's a winner.  It features four articles, all of which are of interest:

  • "'Socratic Solitaire' Implications of In re Tobacco II for Proof of Injury in Antitrust and Unfair Competition Class Actions" by Charles H. Samel

  • "In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation:  A Forecast of the Future of Class Certification in the Ninth Circuit" by Caroline Mitchell and Michael Scott
  • "Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.: The California Supreme Court Toughens Standing Requirements Under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act" by Daveed A. Schwartz
  • "Ashcroft v. Iqbal: The Supreme Court's Attempt to Clarify Bell Atlantic v. Twombly" by Matthew Fischer
Previous
Previous

New decision on insurer liability under the UCL: Zhang v. Superior Court (Cal. Capital Ins. Co.)

Next
Next

Two upcoming SF events of interest