Oral argument set in attorney advertising case: Simpson Strong-Tie v. Gore

Last week, the Supreme Court scheduled oral argument in Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. Gore, no. S164174. The argument will take place on Tuesday, April 6, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. in Los Angeles.  These are the issues on review:

(1) Which party bears the burden of persuasion with respect to the applicability of the anti-SLAPP exemptions set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 425.17, subdivision (c)? (2) Does Code of Civil Procedure section 425.17, subdivision (c), exempt from anti-SLAPP protection an advertisement by a lawyer soliciting clients for a contemplated lawsuit?

The case is of interest to attorneys practicing in our area because the contemplated lawsuit was a class action and the attorney was seeking class representatives. The Court of Appeal's opinion is Simpson v. Strong-Tie Co. v. Gore, 162 Cal.App.4th 737 (2008), and here is my earlier blog post on the case.

Previous
Previous

Petition for review and other documents from Weinstat v. Dentsply

Next
Next

Nine post-Tobacco II opinions