Vanderbilt Law Review "roundtable" on Dukes v. Wal-Mart

Vanderbilt Law Review has published an online "roundtable" of articles relating to the Dukes v. Wal-Mart case:

Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, "Introduction: Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.," 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 77 (2010)

Robert G. Bone, "Sorting Through the Certification Muddle," 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 105 (2010)

Alexandra D. Lahav, "The Curse of Bigness and the Optimal Size of Class Actions," 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 117 (2010)

Gregory Mitchell, "Good Causes and Bad Science," 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 133 (2010)

Richard A. Nagareda, "Common Answers for Class Certification," 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 149 (2010)

The roundtable contemplates responses to the first set of articles, so check the Vanderbilt Law Review website later for more. 

[Via]

Previous
Previous

"Blogging - A Personal Connection to Business"

Next
Next

Six pending cases to watch in 2011