Opening brief on the merits filed in Rose v. Bank of America

The opening brief on the merits was filed last Tuesday in Rose v. Bank of America, no. S199074.

The review petition, answer and reply are available at this post.  This is the statement of the issue on review in Rose:

Can a cause of action under the Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) be predicated on an alleged violation of the Truth in Savings Act (12 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq.), despite Congress's repeal of the private right of action initially provided for under that Act?

Previous
Previous

"Is Blogging Dead?"

Next
Next

More documents from Duran v. U.S. Bank