New Ninth Circuit arbitration opinion: Murphy v. DirecTV, Inc.

In Murphy v. DirecTV, Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. Jul. 30, 2013), the Ninth Circuit examined whether Best Buy was entitled to invoke, as an an agent, third-party beneficiary, of otherwise, an arbitration clause in a contract between the consumer plaintiffs and DirecTV.  The answer was no, allowing the UCL and CLRA class action to proceed against Best Buy.

Previous
Previous

Supreme Court reconfirms broad scope of UCL's "unlawful" prong: Rose v. Bank of America, N.A.

Next
Next

Supreme Court to hand down opinions in Rose and Zhang tomorrow