Register now for the State Bar's Golden State Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Institute next week (Updated)

The 23rd annual State Bar Golden State Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Institute will take place next Thursday, October 25 October 24, 2013 at the Julia Morgan Ballroom in San Francisco. [UPDATED:  Please note that the correct date is Thursday, October 24th (not Friday the 25th).]

This is going to be a really interesting event, and I would encourage everyone who handles UCL and CLRA matters to sign up and attend.  During the afternoon, yours truly will be moderating a panel on UCL and CLRA trials.  The panel will feature the attorneys who tried the McAdams v. Monier class action (discussed here, here and here) earlier this year.  McAdams resulted in one of the nine published post-Tobacco II appellate opinions, in which the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's order denying class certification. 

When McAdams went to trial, the defendant was represented by Will Stern of MoFo, author of the Rutter Group guide on 17200 practice.  Attorney Jeff Cereghino of Ram Olson Cereghino & Kopczynski represented the plaintiffs.  They and I have had several preparatory calls, and I have already learned some facsinating things about the practical aspects of taking a class action case to trial in the post-Dukes and post-Duran world. We will be talking about the jury instructions, the special verdict, the post-trial ruling (it was a remarkable one), and more. 

In addition to that panel, the morning update session will cover UCL developments (in addition to antitrust ones), and the big-stakes trials panel will be of interest to anyone who tries class action cases. 

If that is not enough to tempt you, at lunchtime, we will be welcoming California Supreme Court Justice Goodwin Liu as our keynote speaker.  I am very much looking forward to hearing his remarks. 

And last but not least, at the dinner, we will honor Senior Assistant Attorney General Kathleen E. Foote, of the California Department of Justice, who has been named 2013 Antitrust Lawyer of the Year.  Ms. Foote is only the second woman to be so honored in the history of the award. 

I hope to see you there.  The complete schedule for the day appears below.  Click here to register. 

8 a.m. - 9 a.m.	Registration & Continental Breakfast
8:30 a.m. - 8:45 a.m.	General Session Welcoming Remarks Kenneth R. O’Rourke – Incoming Section Chair O’Melveny & Myers LLP - Los Angeles, CA Paul J. Riehle – Incoming Section Vice Chair, Golden State Institute Sedgwick LLP - San Francisco, CA
8:45 a.m. - 10:15 a.m.	Plenary Session #1 Legal Update: Recent Developments in Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law This popular panel returns once again this year. Ourdynamic speakers will provide an overview of recent California andfederal developments in antitrust and unfair competition law. Thomas A. Papageorge, Professor,University of San Diego School of Law, Special Prosecutor, San DiegoCounty District Attorney’s Office - San Diego, CA Thomas Greene, Special Litigation Counsel, Bureau of Competition of the Federal Trade Commission - San Francisco, CA Hon. J. Thomas Rosch, Latham & Watkins LLP - San Francisco, CA
10:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m.	Morning Break
10:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.	Plenary Session #2: Trials “Big Stakes” Antitrust Trials For years, very few large antitrust cases went to triallet alone reached a jury verdict. That era has changed. We havewitnessed an abundance of high stakes antitrust jury trials in the pastcouple of years. Last year, trial lawyers from two of these importantcases, USA v. AU Optronics and Rambus v. Micron andHynix, spoke to us about trial challenges they faced and how theyaddressed them. This year we are again very fortunate to have some ofthe country’s leading antitrust trial lawyers tell us about their recenttrial experiences and, importantly, lessons they learned that willbenefit litigators on both sides of a case as well as the in-houselawyers and clients overseeing antitrust litigation. The trials on ouragenda for this year are: In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation In March 2013, a federal court jury in Brooklyn, NewYork, returned a $54.1 million verdict (trebled to $162.3 million) infavor of a class of vitamin C buyers. Plaintiffs claimed that thedefendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix pricesand production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. Akey part of their defense was that their prices were set at thedirection of the Chinese government. In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litigation / Direct Purchasers Class v. Toshiba In July 2012, a San Francisco federal court jury foundToshiba liable for participating in an international price fixing cartelin violation of the Sherman Act. This trial was one of the first directpurchaser antitrust class actions to be tried to a jury in a long time.Plaintiffs claimed that Toshiba conspired with other internationalmanufacturers to fix the prices at which LCDs were sold. The juryagreed, finding for the plaintiffs and awarding $87 million. In re Urethanes Antitrust Litigation / Direct Purchasers Class v. Dow Chemical In February 2013, a federal court jury in Kansas returneda verdict in favor of a class of purchasers of urethanes for $400million (trebled to $1.2 billion). Post-trial motions and briefing areunderway. Co-moderators:  Niall E. Lynch, Latham & Watkins LLP - San Francisco, CA  Heather S. Tewksbury, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Panelists: Robert E. Freitas, Freitas Tseng & Kaufman LLP – Redwood Shores, CA Joseph Goldberg, Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg Urias & Ward PA- Albuquerque, New Mexico Co-Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel for Direct Purchaser Class - Urethanes William A. Isaacson, Boies Schiller & Flexner LLPWashington, D.C. Lead Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs Class of Direct Purchasers - Vitamin C Daniel S. Mason, Zelle Hofmann Voelbel & Mason LLP - San Francisco, CA Lead Trial Counsel for Defendant Weisheng Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. - Vitamin C Bruce L. Simon, Pearson Simon & Warshaw LLP -San Francisco, CA Co-Lead Trial Counsel for Direct  Purchaser Class - LCD Howard Varinsky, Varinsky & Associates - Emeryville, CA Jury Consultant - LCD
12:30 p.m. - 2 p.m.	Golden State Institute Luncheon Luncheon Keynote Speaker: Hon. Goodwin Liu, Associate Justice of the California Supreme Court - San Francisco, CA We are honored to have Justice Liu, the newest member of our state’s highest court, join us to present his keynote address.
2:15 p.m. - 3 p.m.	Plenary Session #3: Antitrust and IP Reverse Payment Settlements The U.S. Supreme Court issued a watershed ruling thissummer on “reverse payment” settlements -- settlements of pharmaceuticalpatent litigation in which a branded drug company compensates a genericentrant to delay its entry into the market. In FTC v. Actavis, theCourt held these agreements are to be analyzed using the Rule of Reason,not a presumption of unlawfulness or lawfulness. Our distinguished panelists will discuss the Court’sopinion and what it means for litigation challenging these agreements,patent litigation settlements, and the pharmaceutical industry andbeyond, as well as for the California Supreme Court’s decision in thepending Cipro case. Our panelists include the attorney who arguedActavis in the Supreme Court, the leading academician on the subject,trial counsel in Cipro and other class action challenges to reversesettlements, and is moderated by the attorney who filed the ActavisCase. Moderator: Cheryl L. Johnson, Office of California Attorney General - Los Angeles, CA Panelists: Professor Michael A. Carrier, Rutgers Law School - Camden, NJ J Douglas Richards, Cohen Milstein -New York, NY Jeffrey I. Weinberger, Munger Tolles & Olson LLP - Los Angeles, CA
2:15 p.m. - 3 p.m.	Plenary Session #4: Unfair Competition Law and Consumers Legal Remedies Act - Class Certification Issues and Trial Techniques for UCL and CLRA Class Actions This outstanding panel is comprised of lead plaintiffs’ and defense counsel from McAdams v. Monier, Inc.,a UCL/CLRA trial that went to verdict earlier this year. Theplaintiffs consisted of a certified class of 128,000 members who soughtmore $250 million. The trial court overturned a $7.4 million plaintiffs’verdict after rejecting their expert’s testimony. Our panelists willdiscuss the issues they faced regarding class certification, as well ashow they presented their liability case and damages and restitutiontheories. The panel includes the author of The Rutter Group’s UCLtreatise and is moderated by the author of the “The UCL Practitioner”blog and plaintiffs’ oral advocate before the California Supreme Courtin Brinker. Moderator Kimberly Kralowec, The Kralowec Law Group - San Francisco, CA Panelists: Jeffrey B. Cereghino, Ram Olson Cereghino & Kopczynski LLP - San Francisco, CA William L. Stern Morrison, Foerster LLP - San Francisco, CA
3:45 p.m. - 4 p.m.	Afternoon Break
4 p.m. - 5:15 p.m.	Plenary Session #5: Judge's Panel Class Certification Proceedings in Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Cases A distinguished group of state and federal judges willdiscuss certification of class actions and other pretrial and trialproceedings in complex litigation. The focus will be their “real world”experiences and practice pointers. This is a unique opportunity to learndirectly from these highly experienced state and federal judges whoadjudicate major class actions, antitrust and unfair competition cases,and other complex business litigation. Moderator: Penny Preovolos, Morrison & Foerster LLP - San Francisco, CA Panelists: Hon. Marsha S. Berzon, U.S. Circuit Judge, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals - San Francisco, CA Hon. Curtis Karnow, Complex Litigation Judge, San Francisco Superior Court – San Francisco, CA Hon. Virginia A. Phillips, U.S. District Court Judge for the Central District of California - Riverside, CA Hon. John S. Wiley, Complex Litigation Judge, Los Angeles County Superior Court - Los Angeles, CA
5:30 p.m. - 7 p.m.	Reception for Antitrust Lawyer of the Year – Hosted Reception
7 p.m. - 9:30 p.m.	Antitrust Lawyer of the Year Award Dinner and Program Honoree Kathleen E. Foote, Senior Assistant Attorney General, California Department of Justice