UCL's extraterritorial reach in public prosecutor actions: Abbott Labs. v. Superior Court

Yesterday, the California Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Abbott Laboratories v. Superior Court, ___ Cal.5th ___ (Jun. 25, 2020), holding that "[t]he UCL does not preclude a district attorney, in a properly pleaded case, from including allegations of violations occurring outside as well as within the borders of his or her county."  Slip op. at 1. 

On the question of monetary relief in particular, the Court summarized its holding as follows:

In sum, the text of the UCL grants broad civil enforcement authority to district attorneys, and this broad grant of authority is consistent with the statute’s purpose and history. We see no indication that in an enforcement action brought by a district attorney, the Legislature intended to limit civil penalties or restitution to the geographic boundaries of the district attorney’s county.

Id. at 16.  My coverage of the oral argument in this case is available here.