New CLRA decision: Fairbanks v. Superior Court

The CLRA
Written By

In Fairbanks v. Superior Court, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Aug. 23, 2007), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) held that insurance is not a "good" or a "service" within the meaning of the CLRA. An article in today's Daily Journal, "Appellate Ruling Puts Insurers Outside Consumer Remedies Act" (subscription), reports that a petition for review is planned.

Previous

Supreme Court extends time to grant or deny review in McAdams v. Monier, Inc.
Next

Statement of issues on review in Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum