More materials from Weinstat v. Dentsply

Here are more materials from Weinstat v. Dentsply, no. S180179:

The reply brief (at p. 2) cites this blog and this blog post in particular.  That's the post where I listed the nine post-Tobacco II decisions handed down to date. 

As the reply brief notes, I did say that the opinions were difficult to reconcile, but I did not say it was impossible.  And while I appreciate being described to the Supreme Court as a "prominent UCL commentator," I do not support the petition for review in Weinstat.   

Previous
Previous

One-year anniversary of en banc argument in Dukes v. Wal-Mart

Next
Next

Orange County District Attorney's UCL action against Toyota