The First and Only Blog on California’s Unfair Competition Law and California Class Actions
by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Welcome to The UCL Practitioner, the first and only weblog on California’s Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code §§17200 et seq.). Before reading the blog, please review my disclaimer. This blog is not a solicitation for business from members of the public or an invitation for potential new clients to contact me.
In addition to covering the UCL, the blog also covers three overlapping areas of interest to attorneys litigating UCL claims: The Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ. Code §§1750 et seq.); California class action procedure; and California appellate practice. Relevant federal UCL and class action decisions (including caselaw interpreting the Class Action “Fairness” Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (codified in scattered sections of 28 U.S.C.)) also form an important part of the blog’s content.
The UCL Practitioner is by San Francisco class action attorney Kimberly A. Kralowec of Kralowec Law, P.C.. I handle class action and UCL litigation from beginning to end, with a special emphasis on drafting critical trial-level and appellate briefs. Visit my About page for my complete bio, or contact me here.
Date
- September 2025 1
- January 2025 1
- January 2024 1
- January 2023 1
- November 2022 1
- August 2022 4
- January 2022 1
- August 2021 1
- October 2020 1
- September 2020 1
- June 2020 2
- April 2020 11
- March 2020 11
- February 2020 1
- April 2019 10
- March 2019 2
- September 2018 1
- August 2018 1
- July 2018 2
- May 2018 3
- April 2018 2
- March 2018 5
- February 2018 6
- January 2018 6
- December 2017 2
- November 2017 3
- October 2017 2
- September 2017 4
- August 2017 6
- July 2017 4
- June 2017 3
- May 2017 1
- April 2017 1
- March 2017 3
- February 2017 4
- January 2017 6
- December 2016 1
- November 2016 4
- October 2016 19
- September 2016 6
- August 2016 23
- January 2016 1
- October 2015 4
- September 2015 3
- August 2015 4
- July 2015 3
- June 2015 1
- May 2015 2
- April 2015 5
- March 2015 4
- February 2015 10
- January 2015 7
- November 2014 1
- October 2014 2
- August 2014 4
- July 2014 5
- June 2014 7
- May 2014 5
- April 2014 7
- March 2014 14
- February 2014 8
- January 2014 5
- December 2013 14
- November 2013 4
- October 2013 5
- September 2013 6
- August 2013 14
- July 2013 10
- June 2013 11
- May 2013 9
- April 2013 11
- March 2013 15
- February 2013 20
- January 2013 12
- December 2012 15
- November 2012 13
- October 2012 9
- September 2012 19
- August 2012 14
- July 2012 20
- June 2012 15
- May 2012 14
- April 2012 14
- March 2012 13
- February 2012 4
- January 2012 3
- December 2011 5
- November 2011 10
- October 2011 20
- September 2011 10
- August 2011 13
- July 2011 18
- June 2011 8
- May 2011 7
- April 2011 6
- March 2011 12
- February 2011 10
- January 2011 18
- December 2010 9
- November 2010 14
- October 2010 19
- September 2010 13
- August 2010 15
- July 2010 20
- June 2010 10
- May 2010 14
- April 2010 10
- March 2010 14
- February 2010 14
- January 2010 18
- December 2009 12
- November 2009 20
- October 2009 20
- September 2009 6
- August 2009 17
- July 2009 10
- June 2009 11
- May 2009 16
- April 2009 13
- March 2009 22
- February 2009 24
- January 2009 18
- December 2008 13
- November 2008 22
- October 2008 23
- September 2008 10
- August 2008 24
- July 2008 23
- June 2008 3
- May 2008 20
- April 2008 30
- March 2008 19
- February 2008 26
- January 2008 23
- December 2007 19
- November 2007 18
- October 2007 28
- September 2007 11
- August 2007 29
- July 2007 19
- June 2007 26
- May 2007 29
- April 2007 25
- March 2007 33
- February 2007 21
- January 2007 20
- December 2006 18
- November 2006 23
- October 2006 18
- September 2006 24
- August 2006 21
- July 2006 27
- June 2006 15
- May 2006 26
- April 2006 20
- March 2006 31
- February 2006 22
- January 2006 18
- December 2005 17
- November 2005 21
- October 2005 20
- September 2005 26
- August 2005 18
- July 2005 30
- June 2005 1
Category
- Appellate practice 90
- Attorneys’ fees (CCP §... 53
- Class Action "Fairness... 72
- Class actions - Suprem... 212
- Class actions - arbitr... 185
- Class actions - certif... 314
- Class actions - choice... 8
- Class actions - discovery 15
- Class actions - general 89
- Class actions - settle... 60
- General 101
- Kralowec Law, P-C- 3
- Law blogging 114
- MCLE programs 155
- News reports and pract... 173
- Prop- 64 - Supreme Court 73
- Prop- 64 - appellate b... 24
- Prop- 64 - appellate d... 30
- Prop- 64 - general 21
- Prop- 64 - injury in fact 97
- Prop- 64 - oral arguments 10
- Prop- 64 - pending app... 7
- Prop- 64 - trial court... 3
- Schubert Jonckheer Kol... 2
- Supreme Court and Cour... 86
- The CLRA 96
- The Furth Firm LLP 22
- UCL - "fraudulent" prong 62
- UCL - "unfair" prong 70
- UCL - "unlawful" prong 89
- UCL - Supreme Court 132
- UCL - arbitration 6
- UCL - class certification 21
- UCL - competitor actions 21
- UCL - federal decisions 49
- UCL - injunctive relief 26
- UCL - legislative acti... 4
- UCL - preemption 58
- UCL - public prosecuto... 65
- UCL - remedies in general 101
- UCL - restitution 44
- Uncategorized 48